Search results

How did you sleep? :ROFLMAO:

yes, there's barely anything better than bulking for packing muscle ;)

well planned. can be too much, but for a big though guy, yeah, it can be just right

the standard cycle length of SARMs is actually 8 weeks, not 12. Yes, you could run them for 12 weeks, but that's not great advice for a beginner. there are good reasons why it is 8 weeks and that includes testosterone suppression, liver toxicity, cholesterol, and others.

while i know that there are much better options than s4 and lgd, i know lots of people who started their SARMs with either of these and had great results. especiall LGD because it's an awesome mass builder and that's what most beginners are searchign for

for non professional - you're likely to achieve amazing results with that plan ;)

for a non beginner this cycle is good. as said earlier, LGD and S4 as powerful, when stacking together they can produce great results. But they might be too powerful and that's why it's only good for non beginners

agree with @Broren21 you can continue after 8 weeks if you're feeling fine. But after 8 weeks with those compounds you're likely to lower testosterone too much and would drop the cycle

it sounds like a great cycle but the problem is that if you get side effects, you wouldn't know which one causes it. but considering you're a big guy with good experience on anabolic steroids, it shouldn't be a really big problem for you good luck man!

sarms are just like steroids in terms that you need to learn about them before actually using

agree with @Broren21 could maintain the calories a bit higher if you want to pack on muscles and get stronger. don't forget you need to train for hypertrophy (it usually involves training a muscle group once or maximum twice a week with heavy weights). and eat right. 120% calories from Mcdonalds...

SARMS are actually much more helpful than you thought about them. they can actually help you preserve muscle and burn some fat. you could also add GW into your SARMS stack. it's not a SARM but is often considered one. I would recommend you checking cutting SARMS

they actually do. many compounds like cardarine and stenabolic do not need PCT but they are not sarms in the first place

as these fine gentlemen already said it, that's possible. but it depends on many different things such as your body response and type, your exact diet and exercise plan and so much more

I feel you brotha

depends what exactly you're looking for

yes you're right. i just made another post about this. it's actually easier, safer and faster to gain muscle during one cycle, then to burn fat during the other cycle because they require different workout schedules, different nutrition plans and maybe even different SARMs too...

problem with burning fat and gaining muscle is that you need different calorie intake. you burn fat with less calories, but you gain muscle with more calories than your mainteannce. you can do it in case you haven't been working out and dieting, but it's harder if you did. sarms can help, but it...

tren and big are right. you only need PCT if you use products that can suppress testosterone production.

you're not for sure ;)