can't I run stenabolic for longer than 8 weeks?

[AshW10]

recently added stenabolic to my sarms cycle and I seem to have great results from it. can't i run it for longer than 8 weeks? ty

 

[Broren21]

I think of Stenabolic as something like "taking energy from the future you". The more you take, the more likely you are to crush. using it for too long may make your body overly exhausted. I assume that's why cycles shouldn't be longer than 8 weeks

 

[Maloon]

remember bro - any compounds will increase in side effects the longer you use them. transforming physique isn't something you have to rush. it takes time and patience.

 

[Tren300]

maloon is right. the longer you use something, the more likely it is to cause side effects. just stick to the right dosage and cycle length to stay safe

 

[zerko]

that's true... longer cycles involve more risk. but if they work - go for it. just be careful. at least in my humble opinion

 

[wohum]

I think there's a reason everyone says it's better to keep cycles at 8 weeks

 

[AshW10]

Thanks y'all for your responses. I think 8 weeks it is. Not want to damage my health.

 

[Broren21]

doubt you're going to regret it bro. you can recover your body and you'll be able to go for it again later.

 

[ganzoma]

nobody knows the effects of SARMs and stuff like Stenabolic after long term use because they are not so well researched. but we can all see that they are remaining both safe and great working as long as you use them correctly. this is one of the main reasons why using them for longer periods doesn't seem like a viable option.

 

[AshW10]

nobody knows the effects of SARMs and stuff like Stenabolic after long term use because they are not so well researched. but we can all see that they are remaining both safe and great working as long as you use them correctly. this is one of the main reasons why using them for longer periods doesn't seem like a viable option.

the main reason why I gave up on this idea. i'm currently off cycle and still have results. will start later with a boost after having enough break

 

[Broren21]

nobody knows the effects of SARMs and stuff like Stenabolic after long term use because they are not so well researched. but we can all see that they are remaining both safe and great working as long as you use them correctly. this is one of the main reasons why using them for longer periods doesn't seem like a viable option.

that's true.

will start later with a boost after having enough break

yes. true. and you will not compromise your health! IMO it's a great choice

 

[AshW10]

yes. true. and you will not compromise your health! IMO it's a great choice

thanks. that's why i registered this forum and that's why I keep on staying here. your advices including a few other members greatly help me take the right decisions

 

[Janoman]

I've heard that taking stenabolic for long periods will make you feel constantly tired. It works the other way around after a while. Instead of energy, endurance and stamina boost, it will make your body feel tired. That's one of the main reasons why cycle lengths shouldn't be long with it.

 

[AshW10]

well, another helpful info. thanks. wondering why does it happen... strange. a compound that is meant to give you energy works the other way around after a while. lol

 

[Care4Gainz]

yes, that's strange, but i've also heard about it. never ran stenabolic for that long so it would work the other way around. but i've heard of guys saying that they lack energy and endurance when running for too long

 

[AshW10]

then I guess it must be true. and there must be some explanation for that too.

 

[Care4Gainz]

then I guess it must be true. and there must be some explanation for that too.

I assume that the receptors are getting "overly" stimulated. it results in such effects...

 

[Brownchild]

@AshW10 you lost fat from stenabolic?

 

[AshW10]

yes I did. it helped me stay more active which surely helped me lose fat

 

[Brownchild]

thanks. i see more and more people vouching for sr9009