Search results

come back with updates man. yeah, that's exactly what i've been talking about earlier

that's proof that we're all very different, reacting differently even if talking about the same compound.

it may be, i'm not trying to say that it can't. i just hear too often people blaming bad genetics without them even trying, so that's a mistake

i do kind of understand what you're trying to say there brother

if you feel fine, a general rule of thumb is yes, you can start. however, just to make sure, I would have a bloodwork first to make sure that indeed everything is fine for starting the next cycle

sometimes I think that they know very well what they're doing, it's just the money thing they are mostly worried about

food is just one part. @DoM you must first understand what makes you a hard gainer in the irst place

that's actually true. there are studies indicating that rad is pretty suppressive even in tiny doses.

I vouch that. calories should change because this is the biggest difference between bulking vs cutting. that's what defines cutting (cutting calories) and bulking (consuming more calories than you burn) Macros change too more often than not. increasing protein (to feel fuller) and decreasing...

i just answered that to your other post. LGD with RAD together can be too much for a lot of people, but it can be just right for others. it depends on how you respond to such a stack. that's why it is better to use each oen of them separately to see how it goes, then maybe stack, and maybe in...

I found it pretty good, but rad140 was better tbh

not everyone can tolerate rad and lgd together as it can be too powerful. maybe only if talking about lower doses

are you talking about hypertrophy? I mean muscle mass? if so, yes, lgd seems a better mass bulker than rad. and mk677 is definitely a better bulker than sr9009 which is not a bulker in the first place

not everyone experiences ED from S23...

one of the most controversial SARM is S23. Some swear by it, others say that it is the worst they ever used. so... yeah...

according to this article: https://www.michelegreenmd.com/does-sweat-cause-acne sweat can both cause acne or treat it, depending on some factors. yeah, it is. can really supercharge performance.

yeah, you're right, they'll both help with both needs. but GW501516 will do a better job at burning fat than SR9009. While the SR9009 would do a better job than GW501516 at enhancing endurance. despite the fact that, as said, they will both help with it.

thanks. i may sometimes be wrong, but i still try to help with whatever I can.

well. it also depends on the dosage. but generally yes, longer cycles with lower doses could be safer than shorter cycles with higher doses. simply because the body has more time to cope with the SARMs you use. and yes, 12 weeks is a pretty long cycle.

I think that you have enough experience with SARMs to give it a try man. this is true.