12 weeks vs 8 weeks sarms cycle

[ganzoma]

Hi everyone. Would really love your opinion on this. I know that 8 weeks is common sarms cycle but i think of going to 12 weeks. I have two options. Please share your opinions. By the way, I'm 33 years old, it's not my first SARMs cycle. 5'1 and 200 lb. want to try my first recomp.
Option 1 LGD4033 + GW 12 weeks
Or
Option 2 LGD4033+ GW + S4/andarine 8 weeks

 

[Broren21]

The best thing about SARMs is the fact that cycles with these compounds are flexible. This means that you could go for 8 weeks cycle and then continue to 12 weeks if you're feeling fine.
about adding S4 - you could do it if you already had LGD+GW cycle and it was fine.

 

[Care4Gainz]

agree with @Broren21 you can continue after 8 weeks if you're feeling fine. But after 8 weeks with those compounds you're likely to lower testosterone too much and would drop the cycle

 

[greekbody]

agree with @Broren21 you can continue after 8 weeks if you're feeling fine. But after 8 weeks with those compounds you're likely to lower testosterone too much and would drop the cycle

in fact, that's unlikely to have such a low T level after 8 weeks of S4 and LGD together to drop the cycle. It's actually 12 weeks cycle length that you could run them as a standard cycle length

 

[greekbody]

In fact, at weeks 8 they reach the maximum potential so I would actually go for 12 weeks cycle in order to take the most out of the cycle. Stopping when they are peaking won't allow you to get those 4 weeks worth of gains that can be a lot!

 

[Care4Gainz]

in fact, that's unlikely to have such a low T level after 8 weeks of S4 and LGD together to drop the cycle. It's actually 12 weeks cycle length that you could run them as a standard cycle length

the standard cycle length of SARMs is actually 8 weeks, not 12. Yes, you could run them for 12 weeks, but that's not great advice for a beginner.
there are good reasons why it is 8 weeks and that includes testosterone suppression, liver toxicity, cholesterol, and others.

 

[galvor]

far not an expert but i also know that sarms cycles are 8 weeks. 12 weeks can go with non sarms compounds like mk677. correct me if i'm wrong

 

[greg01]

i also agree that 8 weeks is actually safer and better. at least, that's how i would use

 

[LemuelPP]

Option 1 LGD4033 + GW 12 weeks

I would go for this option as long as you have experience and know what you're doing

 

[Broren21]

the standard cycle length of SARMs is actually 8 weeks, not 12. Yes, you could run them for 12 weeks, but that's not great advice for a beginner.
there are good reasons why it is 8 weeks and that includes testosterone suppression, liver toxicity, cholesterol, and others.

that's exactly the reason why i said to go for 8 weeks and then extend to 10-12 weeks if he feels fine.

 

[greekbody]

the standard cycle length of SARMs is actually 8 weeks, not 12. Yes, you could run them for 12 weeks, but that's not great advice for a beginner.
there are good reasons why it is 8 weeks and that includes testosterone suppression, liver toxicity, cholesterol, and others.

yes, but you get better results from longer cycles. so my point is that as long as your health allows you - longer cycles are better in terms of results.

 

[Broren21]

that's why - return to point zero. Go for 8 weeks cycle but if you can tolerate it well, extend it to 10 or 12 weeks.

 

[ganzoma]

didn't even expect so many responses. thanks guys! I decided to add S4 to the stack and I guess i'm going to follow your advice of seeing how it's going to be at the end of week 8

 

[LemuelPP]

didn't even expect so many responses. thanks guys! I decided to add S4 to the stack and I guess i'm going to follow your advice of seeing how it's going to be at the end of week 8

not sure. lgd with s4 for 12 weeks can be too much. but yes... just listen to your body i guess

 

[galvor]

not sure. lgd with s4 for 12 weeks can be too much. but yes... just listen to your body i guess

what do you think about stenabolic and cardarine? both are not technically sarms so i assume I should be fine?

 

[Care4Gainz]

just listen to your body i guess

that's actually a golden and really important rule to follow.

what do you think about stenabolic and cardarine? both are not technically sarms so i assume I should be fine?

do you mean using them for 12 weeks? I assume you should be fine as long as you don't develop side effects in the meantime.

 

[ganzoma]

not sure. lgd with s4 for 12 weeks can be too much. but yes... just listen to your body i guess

then maybe i will drop s4 and go with lgd if i feel fine.

what do you think about stenabolic and cardarine? both are not technically sarms so i assume I should be fine?

not 100% sure about stenabolic but i've seen guys running gw for 12 weeks just fine

 

[Broren21]

didn't even expect so many responses. thanks guys! I decided to add S4 to the stack and I guess i'm going to follow your advice of seeing how it's going to be at the end of week 8

good luck bro

 

[galvor]

do you mean using them for 12 weeks? I assume you should be fine as long as you don't develop side effects in the meantime.

yeah, for 12 weeks. thanks for your answers man.

not 100% sure about stenabolic but i've seen guys running gw for 12 weeks just fine

huge thanks.

 

[Broren21]

just remember that you've gotta have a good diet and workout plan