similar here. what do you plan to use?hello man, great! preparing for my next bulking plan soon. you?
rad and mk677, but gw501516 instead of lgd4033gotta be LGD with RAD and MK677 you?
lgd could be a better option for bulking, i guess you know thatrad and mk677, but gw501516 instead of lgd4033
well. it also depends on the dosage. but generally yes, longer cycles with lower doses could be safer than shorter cycles with higher doses. simply because the body has more time to cope with the SARMs you use.Wouldn't it be a better option to run RAD140, for example, alone for 12 weeks, than RAD140 with LGD4033, for example, for 6 weeks?
what if both? i already got lgd and rad as well as mk677. want to go through a serious bulking cycle soon. plan to get from 200 lbs to at least 220 or preferably 230 lbs in this cycle that would last 12 weeks (8 weeks with lgd and rad and 4 more weeks with mk)lgd could be a better option for bulking, i guess you know that
thanks man!well. it also depends on the dosage. but generally yes, longer cycles with lower doses could be safer than shorter cycles with higher doses. simply because the body has more time to cope with the SARMs you use.
and yes, 12 weeks is a pretty long cycle.
makes sense, thank you for your timei just answered that to your other post. LGD with RAD together can be too much for a lot of people, but it can be just right for others. it depends on how you respond to such a stack. that's why it is better to use each oen of them separately to see how it goes, then maybe stack, and maybe in lower doses. as for the cycle length - yeah, do not go over 8 weeks with LGD or RAD, or especially both. whereas you could go for 12 weeks with MK677
always welcome bromakes sense, thank you for your time